Learn from Nathan how to find a Sufficient Assumption on an actual LSAT question, Test 73.
LSAT Logical Reasoning requires neither mastery of formal logic nor the ability to diagram arguments. Don’t fall for this gimmick. Read on to discover our more intuitive approach to LR.
Arguments comprise most of the LSAT. Honing your ability to eviscerate bad arguments is a surefire method for improving your score on the test's Logical Reasoning section.
To understand LSAT Logical Reasoning questions, you must understand how an argument functions. Here’s what you need to know about arguments and how to evaluate them.
What makes an argument valid or invalid? Why is validity important on Logical Reasoning? Learning the differences between good and bad arguments will improve your LSAT score.
I used to teach Necessary Assumption questions all wrong. I was suckered by LSAT dogma, and I thought that it was my duty to teach Necessary Assumption questions in a confusing, convoluted manner.
You don’t suck at necessary assumption questions, but you may be struggling with Logical Reasoning more broadly. Remember: the game is to attack the argument. Your job is to disagree.
Read on to debunk the theory that you’re better off reading the question stem first on LSAT Logical Reasoning questions.
Learn how to conquer the “Flaw” question type on LSAT Logical Reasoning.
Learn how to conquer the “Role” question type on LSAT Logical Reasoning.