Guilty or Not Guilty LR
10:00 pm
1 hr
Intermediate
Recording
Premium or Live plan required.
Syllabus
Logical Reasoning
Test 122, Section 4, Q20 — Sugar consumption
Test 126, Section 1, Q4 — Delta vacuum cleaners
Test 124, Section 3, Q8 — Cleaning products
Extra practice
Test 122, Section 2, Q25 — Cecile’s association
Highlights
Lions, tigers, assumptions—oh my! Today’s class featured sufficient and necessary assumption questions. We found out that, in many instances, the answer to a sufficient assumption question might be the same for a necessary assumption question, too. After carefully reading through each passage, we isolated the gap and/or unstated premise and then came up with a prediction that filled in that gap. We also paid careful attention to whether the author would agree with our prediction. If they did agree, then we knew we were on the right track.
Kevin Kissinger
Kevin loves those precious “a-ha!” moments on the LSAT. He’ll help you build the skills to discover those moments. He enjoys every section of the test, especially Logical Reasoning.
LSAT Journey: 153 → 174
Channel your inner attorney as we dive into LR passages and put them on trial! In this class, we’ll dissect arguments, judge their merits, and determine whether they’re guilty or not guilty (of being flawed). All levels welcome!