Guilty or Not Guilty—LR

2:30 am

1 hr

Intermediate

Recording

Premium or Live plan required.

Syllabus

Test 65, Section 1, Q11 — Mr. Tannisch

Test 17, Section 2, Q12 — Public health

Test 17, Section 2, Q13 — Public health

Test 17, Section 2, Q14 — Ravonia

Extra practice

Test 65, Section 1, Q9 — Dinosaur gallop

Test 65, Section 1, Q12 — Shrimp

Test 65, Section 1, Q13 — Halophytes

Highlights

We jumped right into a question about the presumed innocence of Mr. Tannisch, and how he actually might be a suspect in the inspector's case. We then discussed two questions —a necessary assumption question and a weaken question — about Public Health and how peer-review might actually be important when disseminating health information. While reviewing these two questions, we made some sharp distinctions between necessary and sufficient assumptions! We ended the night with a tricky paradox question about Ravonia and its timber industry and why demand doesn't necessarily equate to an increase in wood production.

Kevin Kissinger

Kevin Kissinger

LSAT Tutor

Kevin loves those precious “a-ha!” moments on the LSAT. He’ll help you build the skills to discover those moments. He enjoys every section of the test, especially Logical Reasoning.
LSAT Journey: 153 → 174

This Class

Display your inner attorney as we dive into LR passages and press charges against them! In this class, we’ll identify the issue, if they’re guilty or not guilty (of being bad), and discover why they are so heinous. All levels are welcome!