Nathan’s Class

Logic Games

Test 52, Game 3 — Seminars

Reading Comprehension

Test 77, Passage 1 — Humanities

Logical Reasoning

Test 56, Section 3, Q4 — NoSmoke

Test 88, Section 4, Q8 — BigFoods

Test 76, Section 4, Q5 — Religion

Highlights

Nathan opened class by answering some questions about worlds. He explained what we should be thinking from the start of a game to the end of a game when trying to incorporate worlds. Similarly, Nathan addressed some questions about preparing for test day and concerns about why that “click” hasn’t happened yet.

First up on the docket was a game organizing seminars into different sessions. By baking rules into worlds, Nathan expressed how easy it truly is to destroy a game. It does take time to build worlds, but because of these worlds, the questions were a cakewalk.

Next, Nathan read the Reading Comprehension passage as if he was “a lawyer hungry for work.” With this attitude and approach, interest in the passage remained high, and the class more effectively understood the passage. Like the game, the passage’s questions were easy.

Lastly, the class ended on Logical Reasoning with two Flaw questions and a Supported question. Arguments are often dumber than they look, and as future lawyers, it is our job to find the issues and either exploit them or patch them up.